Is Bautista afraid leaving would open can of worms?

Comelec Commissioner Rowena Guanzon has advised Andy Bautista to at least go on leave while he is agonizing over the decision on whether to fight it out or just resign from his position.
“I gave him that advise several times in the presence of other commissioners,” Guanzon said in an interview with Bombo Radyo Bacolod.
Guanzon admitted that the scandal has affected Bautista’s ability to perform as Comelec Chairman. Documents, including payrolls, that require his signature are often delayed, she said.
And as the crisis deepens, Comelec as an institution will be adversely affected.
Indeed, it is selfish for Bautista to put his ego over the interests of the Comelec as a whole. He should not have hesitated one second after the scandal broke out. He should have resigned right away.
What is stopping Bautista from leaving his position?
Is he afraid that his departure would open a can of worms and expose election cheating as most people already suspect?
Bautista is burying himself deeper in sh*t with each day that passes by with him still hanging on.

Bautista is a leech

Comelec Chairman Andres Bautista is still fighting immense pressure for him to just step down from his post and face the unexplained wealth case before the Ombudsman.

What could be holding him back? I read the blog of ABS-CBN House reporter RG Cruz two days ago and he quoted Commissioner Arthur Lim that something was likely to happen “in the next few days”. Lim hinted at resignation or going on leave.

Is Bautista still hoping that a miracle will suddenly extinguish the conflagration that is engulfing him? His brother, Dr. Martin Bautista, isn’t helping him deal with the crisis. On the contrary, Dr. Bautista only doused aviation fuel on the issue as more exposes about his medical practice in Oklahoma raised more questions than answered.

It’s more likely Bautista is waiting for cues from his Liberal Party bosses. His departure from Comelec might pave the way for the discovery of evidence that indeed, massive cheating occured in the May 2016 elections.

Stop being a leech, Andy. You should have resigned last week yet. But it’s not too late.

Investments and the PH electoral process

An investor puts his money where it will generate the best possible returns at the lowest possible risks. Investment is about making money grow. The world’s richest investors like Warren Buffet and Charles Munger carefully pick from an array of stocks, bonds, hedge funds, mutual funds and the like to make that happen.

But none of them, I am sure, will ever put their money in savings deposits in banks as investments. Savings deposits hardly earn interest income: almost all banks offer only 0.25% per annum interest on them, minus 20% withholding tax on interest earnngs. Bank of the Philippine Islands, Metrobank, Banco de Oro are among the banks I checked.

Because of this, the explanation of Comelec Chairman Andres Bautista that the several hundred million pesos in 32 savings accounts in a little known bank in Laguna are his family’s “investments” that he handles will simply crumble. It cannot be investments, for otherwise, he did his parents and siblings a grave disservice.

From the looks of it, that money is ill-gotten wealth. And the patterns revealed by his estranged wife — daily deposits of just a little less than P500,000 to keep within the threshold set by Central Bank and AMLA for red-flagging — would also indicate the element of money-laundering. It is prima facie evidence Bautista wanted to avoid detection for keeping huge bank deposits.

But the more serious implications of this explosive revelations by Mrs. Patricia Bautista is the possibility — more huge than slight — that the money came from bribes to the Comelec Chairman in exchange for manipulating the results of the May 9, 2016 elections.

This is the reason Senator Grace Poe supported the move initiated by Senate Majority Floor Leader Tito Sotto for a Blue Ribbon Committee investigation into Bautista’s bank deposits and properties not included in his Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN).

The results of the elections have already been put into question with the electoral protest filed by former Senator Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos against the allegedly spurious victory of Vice President Leni Robredo. Robredo, who only won by a little more than 200,000 votes, could have been a recipient of vote-counting machine manipulation. Another reason to doubt the results was the 18.6 million votes obtained by Senator Franklin Drilon to bring him to the number one slot, edging out the highly-popular Tito Sotto and Manny Pacquiao.

The very core of our democracy is at stake here. The Filipino people have a right to know if the money in those bank deposits were bribes Bautista received from the Liberal Party. If the deposits as revealed by Mrs. Bautista indeed took place in the months preceding the elections, then that should be sufficient to establish prima facie evidence. Congress should now look at shielding the electoral process from human intervention, especially from Comelec Commissioners themselves. How to do it? I don’t know. But this is the direction reforms should take.


Can a Cabinet Secretary just wave away hundreds of millions of pesos in public funds sunk into a government project in computing its asset valuation for purposes of ascertaining its rental rate, and say his Department is not interested in recovery of the money for ROI purposes?
This is now an issue I am pursuing with the Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise Zone Authority (TIEZA) after I discovered how it fixed the asset valuation for the Iloilo Convention Center (ICC) at only P330 million when it set the minimum bid more than a year ago.
From records I have in hand, no less than P750 million in public funds, with nearly half of it coming from the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP), were disbursed for the construction of this project initiated by Senator Franklin Drilon.
I have exposed this project as grossly overpriced, and the procurement for the contract was apparently rigged. The memorandum of agreement between the land donor, Megaworld, and the Department of Tourism, set the cost of the ICC at only P200 million. Drilon had planned to jack up the price to P1 billion; the exposes stopped him 3/4 of the way. The ICC is not finished after P750 million.
For over a year, TIEZA peddled the management contract for the ICC using P750 million as the asset value for over a year. Each bidding for the contract ended in failure. That’s not surprising. Because the cost is much too high, and the rental rate will be based on it. Even just set at 10% of the asset value, the rental would be an astronomical P75 million a year.

Ultimately, the TIEZA Board revised the terms of reference for the contract. During a meeting in January 2015, then DOT Secretary Ramon Jimenez reportedly told the Board that the DPWH through then Secretary Rogelio Singson had manifested it was no longer interested in recovering its share in the project of P320,000,000! That paved the way for the TIEZA Board to reduce the asset value at P330 million representing the corporate funds disbursed for the project.

The TIEZA Board set the minimum, or floor, bid for the contract at 1% of the asset value, which would translate to P3.3 million annually.

Even then, the winning bid amounted to only P1.9 million annually! It’s a “bagsak-presyo” bargain. At that rental rate, the government cannot even recover 10% of the supposed P330 million asset value in 100 years! What kind of business decision is that?

This is now concrete evidence that the whole ICC project was just intended to be a conduit for the DAP pork barrel funds for Drilon! It was never intended to be the showcase of Ilonggo culture and history that would serve as magnet for conventions and visitors to Iloilo City!

I have asked TIEZA Assistant Chief Operating Officer Jetro Francis Lozada for the minutes of the meeting in January 2015 in which Secretary Singson reportedly told the Board the DPWH was no longer interested in recovering its investments. Singson had no right to throw away public funds just like that!

After more than a month, TIEZA hasn’t furnished me the documents I requested. Is this a cover-up in the making? I am sure the Duterte administration will strongly object to that kind of official behavior.

This time, Drilon will have to give an accounting to the people of the Philippines!


SMEX Convention Center makes obvious overpricing of Iloilo Convention Center

I visited the SMX Convention Center for the first time yesterday to view the exhibits for the CONEX 2017 Trade Exhibition of the United Architects of the Philippines.
As soon as I entered its portals, I was overwhelmed by the enormity of the facility — with four floors and costing only P900 million.
I had long compared SMEX Convention Center with the Iloilo Convention Center, for which the government had spent a total of P740 million so far, and still only 85% completed.
The SMEX Convention Center has a total leasable space of 21,000 square meters. ICC has only around 6,400 square meters in leasable space. The difference is big, but ICC cost more to build. Of course, much of the construction cost didn’t go to the construction.
This makes the corruption in the ICC stand out like a sore thumb.
It’s time the Duterte administration reopens the investigation into the anomalous project.

The washing of the feet

Today is Maundy Thursday, and Christians all over the world commemorate the Last Supper that Jesus Christ had with his disciples. It was the night before He was to be hanged on the Cross, which He already knew will happen, and the man who had betrayed Him was also at the table. Jesus took bread and wine in an act that transformed them into His flesh and blood. He was giving Himself as a supreme sacrifice to show us He was giving up His own life for our salvation.

But there is another meaningful event that took place that night, something that many Christians overlook or simply fail to appreciate. It was the act of Jesus washing the feet of His disciples. It was a great act of humility that Jesus did to set an example that He had wanted every believer to follow: Service to others. And even though He knew Judas had betrayed Him, he didn’t leave the traitor out. Jesus also washed the feet of Judas.

Indeed, most people fail, or even refused, to understand the washing of the feet as their mandate to help and serve others, and even forgive their enemies. Peter protested when it was his turn to have his feet washed. Jesus was master and mentor. The act of washing his feet was humiliating. But Jesus overruled Peter. If He, Jesus, who was master and mentor, could wash the feet of His disciples as an act of service, then how much more his disciples and ordinary mortals? It was servant leadership at its height.

This is an important point for reflection as we commemorate Maundy Thursday. Many of us live without regard for the welfare of our fellow human beings. We live only for ourselves. Many make so much money and do not even think for a second how part of that money can feed the hungry or heal the sick. And Jesus gave His life for us; how many of us are willing to die in the service of others? The sad truth is that only a few — too few — will think about putting themselves in harm’s way even if this will save others.

Our political leaders, too, ought to reflect on the example set by Jesus. They call themselves “public servants” but do little to give meaning to that title. In fact, many political leaders prey on the people, stealing from the public treasury horrendous amounts of money that should be spent to improving people’s lives. Few of them come close to the model set by Jesus for servant leadership.

The sell-out of the Iloilo Convention Center, Part 2

It’s been more than two years now since I appeared before the Senate Blue Ribbon committee that looked into the anomalies of the Iloilo Convention Center (or “Icon”). I brought with me a trolley suitcase filled with documents that established the irregularities that took place. But the Liberal Party-dominated Senate didn’t want the truth to come out. Hence, they railroaded the investigation to prevent me from disclosing more.

That didn’t stop me from digging for more evidence. And these last two years yielded a bountiful harvest of documents that proves my case. From the procurement stage (bidding) for the structure until the bidding for the lease, operate and manage (LOM) contract, the Icon was marred by violations of the law at almost every stage.

It is now clear the Icon was conceived and designed by Senator Franklin Drilon as a conduit for one of the biggest public frauds in our nation’s history. It was designed, with the cooperation of other agency officials, to enable Drilon to skim off hundreds of millions of pesos coming from the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP).

It started with the idea of Megaworld donating a 1.7-hectare lot in its Iloilo Business Park in the old site of the Iloilo airport in Mandurriao, Iloilo City.

Based on the development plan prepared by Megaworld, the lot that sat between two first-class hotels — Richmonde and Marriot — was clearly intended to be the site for a convention center.

But Megaworld wasn’t then in a hurry to finish the Iloilo Business Park because the business climate didn’t make it feasible as yet. Drilon, however, wanted Megaworld to get things to move faster. The construction of Richmonde was going slow at the time. Clearly, Megaworld wanted the business environment to improve before going full-swing with its development work. Drilon had other ideas.

This was when Drilon broached the idea to Megaworld of a swap: Megaworld will donate the 1.7-hectare land, and the government, through the Department of Tourism and TIEZA, will build a convention center. It was understood that after the Icon is finished, the management contract will be awarded to Megaworld. It was a perfect arrangement. Megaworld would have its convention center at no expense, and have the anchor project to attract more visitors to its Richmonde and Marriot hotels.

How do I prove that the deal was for Megaworld to supposed to have its cake and eat it, too?

On May 5, 2014, TIEZA issued this Notice of Award for the lease, operate and manage the Icon to Megaworld after holding its first public bidding for the contract.



For still unknown reasons, the contract with Megaworld was never perfected. But what this proves is that TIEZA was lying when it said that its previous public biddings all resulted in a failure. The issuance of a notice of award means that a successful bidding was consummated. It means a post-qualification evaluation had been conducted, and the bid submitted by Megaworld was found to be the most responsive bid.

And this shows that all the while, Drilon et al were only engaged in a “moro-moro”. Megaworld was indeed going to operate and manage the Icon. It’s just that the contract was not perfected. I have asked TIEZA Assistant Chief Operating Officer Jetro Nicolas Lozada for a copy of the BAC resolution and other papers to enlighten the public on what happened. In his email two days ago, he said he referred my request to the Special Bids and Awards Committee.

Drilon has a lot of explaining to do. Why did he push for the construction of a convention center far beyond the original construction cost of P200 million and then just agree to have it managed by Megaworld? In effect, Drilon used public funds for a structure that would benefit Megaworld if the plan had stuck to the original script. What was the consideration?

This issue about the Icon is far from dead. It merely hibernated after the Liberal Party forcibly drowned out the truth on November 13, 2014. We will expose every aspect of the anomalous project until the Duterte administration fully understands the magnitude of the corruption committed by Drilon. This is a total waste of public funds which Drilon generously scooped out from the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP).