Preventive suspension in ICC case sought


PRESS RELEASE

Former Iloilo provincial administrator Manuel Mejorada has asked the Ombudsman to issue preventive suspensions against two Cabinet members and five other officials charged in the alleged anomalies in the Iloilo Convention Center project, saying the evidence against them is strong and their continued stay in office might prejudice the investigation.

In a two-page motion filed December 17, Mejorada said the respondents in the administrative case are facing charges of dishonesty and grave misconduct which warrant their preventive suspension as they occupy powerful positions in the Department of Tourism, Department of Public Works and Highways as well as the Tourism Infrastructure and Enterprise Zone Authority (TIEZA).

Mejorada made public the document only yesterday to give time for its delivery by the Philippine Postal Corp. after the Christmas holidays.

Mejorada cited Section 9, Rule III, of the Ombudsman Rules of Procedure which empowers the Ombudsman to issue preventive suspension orders against respondents in an administrative case for a period not exceeding six months while a preliminary investigation is being conducted.

Charged in the administrative case are DPWH Secretary Rogelio Singson, DOT Secretary Ramon Jimenez Jr., TIEZA chief operating officer Mark Lapid, DPWH undersecretaries Jaime Pacanan and Romeo Momo, DPWH Region VI regional director Edilberto Tayao and BAC chairman Marilyn Celiz.

The project proponent, Senate President Franklin Drilon, is charged with them in the criminal case along with architect William V. Coscolluela and contractor Hilmarc’s Construction Corp.

Mejorada said he has received the counter affidavits of the respondents.

“After going through their voluminous counter affidavits and supporting documents, it becomes clear from their own testimonies that a giant fraud was committed in the ICC project,” Mejorada said.

In a statement, Mejorada said “the respondents themselves dug their own grave with their counter affidavits.”

He cited the admission of Coscolluela that the “value engineering” bid proposal submitted by Hilmarc’s did not meet his criteria and had to be revised with help from a structural design consultant he endorsed.

“That’s all I need to drive home the point that the award of the contract was illegal,” he said.

But he added that he found “an abundance of other evidence” from the counter affidavits of the other respondents who were forced to disclose records that were previously kept under wraps. (30)

About Manuel "Boy" Mejorada
Manuel "Boy" Mejorada is a journalist and social media activist. A former Iloilo provincial administrator, he is now waging a crusade against corruption and narco-politics.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: